I really liked this article by Amanda Marcotte, Nirvana’s Secret Feminism. Not only because it focuses on Nirvana’s, and more specifically, Cobain’s, pro-feminist ethos (something too often overlooked in those umpteen ‘the REAL story of Nirvana!’ features malestream rock journalists like to trot out over and over again); but also because she highlights the profound impact a male rock band can have on the lives of their female fans and the pleasure and validation we can get from listening to their music (something too often overlooked in those umpteen ‘Riot Grrrl RULES! Dude music does nothing for us grrrls!’ features feminists like to trot out over and over again).
But why only focus on Nirvana? Pearl Jam also, “broke with the sexist norms of the era, choosing instead a pro-feminist public stance and song lyrics”. (And like Nirvana have also reached a 20-year anniversary- though not just that marking the release of their seminal album, but the successful 20-year career that followed too. Don’t burn out before your time. Steel yourself & bust through the bad. Know the joy of survival, of being Alive.)
Songs such as Why Go, Daughter and Betterman are as feminist as anything Bikini Kill ever put to tape. Eddie Vedder has made pro-choice and anti-rape statements on stage. He scrawled Pro-Choice on his arm during the band’s MTV Unplugged performance in 1992. They’ve Rocked for Choice. They’ve hung out with Gloria Steinem. Toured with and heart Sleater-Kinney (I’d never heard of Sleater-Kinney until I got into PJ. Now I heart them too). And you can find ripostes to this generally fucked-up capitalist war-mongering patriarchal world in which we live in a fair few of the band’s song lyrics and from other stuff they’ve said over the years.
In fact, that whole ‘grunge’/early ‘90s ‘alt rock’/whatever-you- want-to-call-it ‘scene’ was largely pro-feminist. Nirvana, Pearl Jam, and Soundgarden too, all consciously set out to do rock ‘n’ roll in a different way to the hair metal bands that dominated rock before them. Out went the shit lite riffs and unoriginal lyrics, and in came guitars that soared and sludged and rattled raw and heavy in a myriad interesting and beautiful ways; songs that struck the whole heart/mind/soul. Here was a bunch of male rock musicians who were openly sensitive and intelligent, who weren’t afraid to wear their hearts on their sleeves. Yet Cobain/Vedder/Cornell were also still quite masculine. But it’s this “man-womanly/woman-manly” (to quote Virginia Woolf) combination, which for me, made ‘grunge’ music, and the men who made it, so different, sexy, inspiring… and feminist.
They don’t make ‘em like that anymore, do they? However, I don’t quite share Marcotte’s view that the more ‘macho’ bands that have entered the rock mainstream following grunge’s demise make no room for the female/feminist rocker. According to Marcotte, the likes of Slipknot, Metallica and Limp Bizkit, unlike Nirvana (& co.), are ““no girls allowed”-style bands”. Whilst I agree that the sound of these bands and the masculinities they perform are more macho (and Limp Bizkit’s attitudes towards women far from progressive), I don’t think they send the message: “no girls allowed.”
Go to any Slipknot/Metallica/Limp Bizkit/other all-male heavy rock band show and you’ll find girls in the mosh pit: screaming, dancing, singing, head banging, moshing, crying, smiling; feeling fuckin’ strong and empowered and excited and Alive because up there on that stage is a band making the fastest/hardest/loudest/cacophonous noise, the only noise that seems to sum up and spit out what she’s feeling inside, that encapsulates all that’s fucked-up about everyone and everything in this world. In this music, this ‘macho-manliness’, she finds release, because it sounds like the inside of her head, it speaks to her, and gives her a voice, a sense of her own identity. It sets her free. Therefore, go to any Slipknot/Metallica/Limp Bizkit/other all male-heavy rock band show and you’ll see feminism in action.
When feminists say that certain rock bands are ‘no-girls allowed’ they’re not just warning women of the sexism they may encounter should they listen to them. They are also, in a more subtle way, warning women off those bands full stop. We’re effectively saying, ‘don’t listen to [insert all-male band here], they’ve got nothing to say to us, you should listen to [insert all-female band here] instead.’ In other words, we end up sounding like feminist police. And in the process we ignore and silence those female fans and musicians who do take part in the more heavy/metal/’macho’ sub-genres of rock, who may have gravitated to those genres precisely because there was something in the heaviness/macho-ness of the music that they liked and could identify with.
After all, ‘macho’ bears no intrinsic relation to ‘male’. Women can be macho. And macho doesn’t have to be oppressive or domineering or sexist. When ‘macho’ is performed in rock, it’s often just a sound, a roar, that’s used to capture and give vent to some of those strong and uncomfortable feelings and frustrations all us human beings experience, which may have nothing at all to do with hating on women. It’s just another form of self-expression and one which women can also experience and enjoy.
And besides, there are some male rock bands around today – Muse, Mastodon, and fuck it, I’ll include Metallica here too (and that’s just the bands beginning with ‘M’) – who do manage, invoking that grunge spirit, to fuse their masculinity, intelligence, and ear for a wistful melody, to create meaningful, interesting music that rocks bloody hard and bloody good.
But of course these bands don’t come together under one ‘scene’ a la grunge. I think it’s unlikely we’ll enjoy another era of pro-feminist rock like that we experienced in the early ‘90s. Music scenes come about differently these days; they’re so much more fragmented and transient. And as Marcotte’s article points out, rock music doesn’t have such a hold on the cultural mainstream anymore. The rock music that is the most popular seems to be the sort that has the least to say, is the least challenging. Mainstream pop culture also has less time than it did in previous decades for anything potent or political, particularly when it comes to music. Media has got more commercial, and consequently more conservative. We could see that as a shame; there’s so much that needs to be said and protested given the state of the world right now and yet there’s little opportunity for someone to be able to come forward and sing something. Although it’s hard to break through into the mainstream, with meaningful music, a meaningful message, without it eventually getting twisted, diluted, and all the meaning snuffed out of it. That’s what happened to ‘grunge’/early ‘90s ‘alt rock’/whatever-you-want-to-call-it.
Despite this though, there is still good, heartfelt rock music out there to discover and enjoy; that which came before, that which is around now, and that which is to come; rock music that does, and always will, harbour a secret feminism.
~
Pearl Jam – Daughter
“She holds the hand that holds her down/She will rise above…. oooooh!!”
October 8th, 2011 at 11:45 pm
I really love your blog, and this is a great article. I just want to point out one other thing. Women seem to be socially conditioned to choose pop music over rock – so, to certain women, the very act of choosing rock over pop may be seen as a feminist act itself. After all, they’re defying the social norms of what music women should like.
My favourite band happens to be Led Zeppelin, and I know certain feminists have accused Led Zeppelin of having misogynistic lyrics – particularly in their early days. Yet, on the other hand, Led Zeppelin are also often thought of as being a “guys’ band”. So, in a sense, there is already the societal view that Led Zeppelin is for men, and not women. So, as such, a woman choosing to listen to Led Zeppelin could be precisely a feminist act. So, for certain other feminists to claim that this woman is not being a “true” feminist is sort of (ironically enough) parroting the same exact view that the patriarchal society upholds – that Led Zeppelin is not for women.
I think it’d be cool to see you address something on this conundrum.
Rock on! \m/
October 10th, 2011 at 6:33 pm
Hi bttf4444, thanks for commenting & I’m glad you liked my posts on feminism & rock music.
I agree with you that a woman who chooses to listen to rock music is defying the feminine stereotype. Which is why I think feminism & rock music are kindred spirits – they both provide a means for women to break out of the limiting stereotypes malestream society place on us and go free!
And you’re right about how feminists end up parroting patriarchal views on what music women are ‘best off’ listening to. Just because a male rock band’s music may be misogynist, or they are popular with men, does not mean there is nothing in that band’s music for women to identify with & have a good time to! With regards to Led Zeppelin, any woman/feminist who likes rock ‘n’ roll should be open to listening to Led Zeppelin, simply because they are one of the greatest and most influential rock bands of all time. This is why I get quite defensive when I see Metallica labelled as a ‘no girls allowed’ style band. Any woman just getting into rock ‘n’ roll shouldn’t be told not to listen to certain all-male bands, just because they may be sexist in a few songs, and especially when those bands are some of the best of all time. Women shouldn’t be warned off listening to Metallica – aside from the fact you’d be hard pressed to find any sexism in their lyrics anyway, they’re just a brilliant rock band. Of course, women don’t have to like Led Zeppelin, Metallica etc. but I would hope their reasons are based on the music not being to their liking, and not just because they are apparently ‘sexist’ and ‘macho’. You’ll miss out on a lot of good rock ‘n’ roll with that attitude!
I’ve left responses to your other comments under those posts.
In the meantime, keep rockin’ on yourself! \m/